Revenue recovery before software replacement
The platform can sit on top of an existing stack first, creating value before asking a club to migrate booking or CRM.
CURRENT VENTURE · SPORTS TECHNOLOGY / SaaS
OLSEN STEINER ROLE · VENTURE DEVELOPMENT · GO-TO-MARKET · PRODUCT STRATEGYRevenue infrastructure for racket clubs — not another booking calendar.
INVESTMENT / OPERATING THESIS
Empty court-hours, cancellations, incomplete matches and dormant players are perishable inventory. FillMyCourt turns those signals into an automated revenue queue and connects CRM, booking, player context and attribution around the economics of the club.
The platform can sit on top of an existing stack first, creating value before asking a club to migrate booking or CRM.
Local racket-sport operations often depend on staff memory, WhatsApp groups and marketplace repeat bookings. Automated lifecycle logic, reactivation and loyalty can create a more defensible customer relationship.
Once enough clubs share a compatible player identity and inventory layer, cross-club discovery, open matches and international booking can create network effects beyond single-venue SaaS.
TECHNOLOGY PARTNER
FillMyCourt is being built as a real SaaS platform, not a presentation prototype. The technical partnership separates venture strategy and club economics from the specialist engineering capacity required to build, secure and scale the product.
Right&Above provides the software-engineering layer for FillMyCourt. Its public expertise spans full-cycle custom software development, backend, web and mobile engineering, SaaS solutions, cloud and infrastructure, DevOps, cybersecurity and AI/ML — from early prototypes through enterprise-grade platforms.
MARKET POSITION
FillMyCourt enters a market where club density, federation structures and player participation are already large enough to support a network product. The software thesis is broader than padel, but padel provides the fastest-growing beachhead while squash adds a federation-led and Olympic visibility angle.
FIP reports that European padel clubs roughly tripled from about 5,000 at the start of 2020 to more than 14,000 in 2025. Strategic-fit bars are Olsen Steiner's product view, not market-share estimates.
BUSINESS MODEL
FillMyCourt can monetise earlier than a full-system replacement because the first value proposition is recovered revenue. Booking, CRM, white-label apps, media and enterprise control expand the account over time.
Audit empty inventory, cancellation leakage, marketplace fees and player lifecycle.
Automate reactivation, off-peak demand, match completion and booking recovery.
Build club-controlled CRM, direct booking and loyalty rather than rent the customer relationship.
Add booking core, white-label app, media and enterprise controls.
Cross-club player identity, open matches and international discovery / booking.
COMMERCIAL / FINANCIAL LENS
The current public pricing architecture combines a €249 monthly base fee with an 8% share of recovered gross revenue. That aligns software revenue with demonstrable club economics and leaves upside from higher-value modules.
At the current €249/month public base price, before revenue share or additional modules.
Current public revenue-share assumption on recovered gross revenue.
Booking, white-label player experience, media connectors, enterprise control and APIs can expand ARPU.
Low physical capex; execution risk is product, integration, sales and club onboarding.
2 / 3 / 5 YEAR VENTURE PATH
This is a strategic scenario, not a forecast. The ranges below illustrate what the current pricing model could support if product-market fit and venue acquisition are demonstrated.
Target state: a repeatable sales and onboarding motion in 1–2 initial European markets.
Target state: a multi-market SaaS platform with direct club economics and early cross-club network effects.
Target state: a recognised revenue and customer operating layer across racket-sport networks.
Illustrative scenario only. Actual venue count, pricing, revenue-share economics, churn and module mix may differ materially.
ILLUSTRATIVE VALUATION FRAME
Professional buyers usually anchor SaaS valuation to current recurring revenue, growth and retention. For orientation only, the scenario below applies a broad 3–8× revenue band to the base-subscription ARR paths already shown above. It is not an appraisal, financing offer or valuation promise.
Illustrative enterprise-value range using €75k–€149k base ARR and a 3–8× revenue reference band.
VALUATION DRIVER · PMF + RETENTION + ATTRIBUTED RECOVERYIllustrative range using €299k–€598k base ARR. Revenue share, enterprise modules and white-label revenue are excluded.
VALUATION DRIVER · MULTI-MARKET GROWTH + NRR + DISTRIBUTIONIllustrative range using €1.49m–€2.99m base ARR. Premium outcomes require strong retention, efficient growth and defensible network economics.
VALUATION DRIVER · SCALE + NETWORK EFFECT + STRATEGIC OPTIONALITY2026 SaaS transaction data shows private-market revenue multiples around the low-single digits at the median, while stronger growth, profitability and strategic value can support materially higher outcomes. We therefore use a deliberately broad 3–8× reference band rather than one headline multiple.
The valuation frame excludes the 8% recovered-revenue share, future enterprise modules, media / data products and any network monetisation. Those are upside layers to validate, not assumptions to capitalise today.
WHAT COULD CREATE A MOAT
The defensibility case is stronger if FillMyCourt becomes the system that understands demand, player lifecycle and inventory economics across clubs — not merely a booking front end.
Credible baseline and incrementality logic are essential if the model charges on recovered revenue.
Proprietary segmentation, timing and lifecycle logic can become a practical moat if it consistently improves club economics.
Partnerships with federations, club groups and associations could reduce CAC and create a route to market competitors cannot easily replicate.
Booking-system APIs, contracts and data rights can slow deployment; the product needs a connector strategy that avoids pretending unsupported integrations exist.
PARTNERSHIP / CAPITAL FIT
The next value inflection is not a larger engineering team by itself. It is a combination of reference clubs, federation / chain access, reliable integrations and measured revenue-recovery evidence.
Booking, CRM, attribution, integrations, security and enterprise controls.
Club groups, federations, associations and ecosystem partners that can lower CAC.
Reference cohorts, retention, NRR, recovered-revenue attribution and gross-margin discipline.
Partners with access to club networks, federation relationships or sports-tech distribution.
Investors comfortable with early B2B SaaS, integration-heavy workflows and recurring revenue.
Club chains, federations and booking ecosystems can create more value than passive capital alone.
OLSEN STEINER ROLE
Olsen Steiner is shaping FillMyCourt as a venture rather than a software feature set: defining the revenue model, club economics, retention and loyalty architecture, product priorities, partnership paths and European go-to-market. The implementation team builds the product; Olsen Steiner steers the commercial thesis, operating logic and route to scale.
STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP / CAPITAL
Olsen Steiner is open to selected conversations with club networks, federations, technology partners and strategic investors who can accelerate product-market fit and distribution.